Blog

Ca lawmakers will mull several state bills that could affect both land and online gambling efforts this present year (Image: Michael Macor, The Chronicle)
A fresh California gambling bill approved week that is last the State Senate could up taxes and review regulatory procedures on the Golden State’s ever-expanding gaming industry. Introduced by Sen. Leland Yee (D-San Francisco), SB 601 goes under the microscope of the gaming policy advisory committee comprised of both industry executives and members of the public, aided by the goal of determining whether the existing regulatory structures that are in place are aiding or abetting California’s current and future outlook that is economic.
Regulatory Review
Also, the panel will review the effect of the state’s numerous card groups on both state and regional tax flows, aswell as on charges to both. Yee stated he’s checking out the chance that more gaming that is non-Indian may help improve California’s ever-struggling coffers to be fuller.
‘Despite the good news we’ve seen in budget projections, I do believe it is usually worth evaluating new revenue sources for our state,’ noted Yee. Once the committee review is complete, the bill that is new proceed to your state Assembly for further assessment.
Of course, as Newton so sensibly noted, for every action there’s a similar and reaction that is equal and nowhere does that hold truer than worldwide of gambling legislation. No sooner had been SB 601 brought to light than the Ca Coalition Against Gambling Expansion (CCAGE) popped up, declaring that the bill that is new absolutely nothing more but a gateway drug for loosening regulatory procedures for operators.
‘SB 601 should be amended to need a look that is balanced the laws and regulations governing gambling, including not just their impeding impact on the industry, nevertheless the social and economic costs inevitably related to gambling expansion among California families and communities — e.g., increased debts, foreclosures and bankruptcies, divorces, suicides, etc.,’ said CCAGE in a letter to legislators in regards to the bill.
Many Viewpoints, Little Agreement
Of course, California has a myriad of factions and viewpoints when it comes to gambling, therefore SB 601 is hardly the legislation that is only the dining table in this arena now. Also under review are SB 678 introduced by Sen. Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana) also known as the ‘Authorization and Regulation of Web Poker and Consumer Protection Act of 2013,’ a bill aimed at legalizing poker that is online, which has the help of eight Indian tribes.
Then there is SB 51 the ‘Web Gambling Consumer Protection and Public-Private Partnership Act of 2013’ introduced by Sen. Roderick Wright (D-Inglewood). Of course, having been found accountable on eight counts of perjury and voter fraudulence week that is last Wright may have more to worry about than gambling legislation right now.
With 38 million residents to draw from, Ca holds by far the most promise of any U.S. state to help make a lot of money from online gambling. In fact, a recent study conducted jointly by the market research firm PokerScout along with consulting company Academicon unveiled the Golden State has a $263 million revenue potential for its first 12 months of iGaming, should it decide to legalize it, and a $384 million possibility for year 10. That being said, other states such as Delaware have actually became pretty far off in their initial projections so far, but with California’s huge population base, there’s way more possible for hitting the mark or near to it in these projections.
Steve Wynn Joins Sheldon Adelson in Anti-Online Gambling Stance
Who woulda thunk it? Sheldon Adelson and Steve Wynn are now actually aligned in their anti-online gambling viewpoints (Image: msn.com)
They say politics makes for strange bedfellows, and also the same could additionally be said for the casino industry. Of course, the lines between politics and gambling industry policy that is regulatory get pretty blurry, and sometimes it’s difficult to discern one from the other, and such is the case with the new professional romance between longtime anti-online gambling crusader Sheldon Adelson, and his new bestie and ally, Steve Wynn.
Macau Is Their Relationship
Perhaps their mutual success in Macau has generated a bond that is new the two casino magnates; whatever it is, Adelson and Wynn definitely two of this most established visionaries in the gambling industry have finally additionally become aligned in an area where Adelson has found few company compadres to join him: his vehement fight against what he claims are the inherent evils of online gambling in America.
Steve Wynn now says he concurs using the Las Vegas Sands CEO that Internet video gaming will be the apocalypse for underage morality within the U.S. if it gets a unilateral federal pass.
‘I end up agreeing with Sheldon,’ said Wynn recently.
This is certainly quite a turnaround from the Steve Wynn who once predicted that Sheldon Adelson would eventually heat up to the idea of online gaming. Au contraire; it seems it comes to the Internet’s potentially corrupting influence via online gambling that it is Wynn who has now seen ‘the light’ when.
Visions of Underage Online Gamblers
Wynn now refers towards the federal government’s ‘insatiable appetite for revenue,’ and foresees we’re uncertain why exactly the risk of underage gamblers by the truckload sneaking through the regulatory checkpoints and also this creating some type of American backlash towards gambling as a whole. Considering that there have certainly been incidents of underage gamblers engaging in land gambling enterprises under the radar at various points in time and the casinos usually get caught and fined for it without Joel Osteen making a Sunday pulpit commentary regarding the topic or pickets going up on the Las Vegas Strip this seems a bit dramatic to us; but that’s Wynn’s tale and he is sticking to it.
‘This isn’t good entrepreneurial opportunity,’ keeps Wynn. ‘ Where is the continuing business opportunity? The big problem I see is I don’t see the government letting us keep the funds.’
Again, we’re maybe not certain what proof he has that 13-year-olds by the boatloads will be crashing online gaming web sites, but this generally seems to be Wynn’s primary focus and concern. He claims that after viewing the latest technological software at sites run by UltimateGaming et al to theoretically block underage players, he is not convinced they are sophisticated sufficient to keep kids a bay. Despite the IT teams telling him the sites are inaccessible to children, Wynn’s reaction was, ‘I’m sure it was impressive if you had been a guy that is cyber. But it was bullsh—.’
Wynn now seems to be up to speed with Adelson’s contention that young teens will work out how to get online and gamble away almost all their own or their moms and dads’ cost savings. We’re not sure how sophisticated your combo of con and penetration that is high-tech might have become to pull that down; and while it is without doubt a possible scenario, so has been hit by a vehicle as soon as we drive, but that does not keep us from getting behind the wheel every time. Setting policy according to worst-case scenarios seems like a tactic that is odd us, but exactly what do we understand; we’re not billionaires with effective land casinos within the U.S. and Macau, are we?
As for Wynn, it’s a maybe that is definite his viewpoints on this for now, anyway. And besides their concerns about underage issues, he’s maybe not sure he wants to you will need to transfer his upscale casino image to a computer screen, and even exactly how that would be doable.
‘ I do not know how to complete that on a screen that is 17-inch’ he said.
‘It’s possible it could change,’ Wynn added, regarding their views on Internet gambling. But he doesn’t think anybody’s opinion will change Congress’s deer-in-headlight stance on Internet gambling, regardless.
‘[Legal gambling passage] can’t get through the homely house of Representatives,’ he revealed. ‘They can’t agree with anything, especially something this esoteric.’
2014 Florida Legislative Session Shying Away from Gambling Expansion
Although it seemed hopeful final year, the 2014 Florida myfreepokies.com legislative session now is apparently shying away from any focus on gambling.
On the year that is last there’s been plenty of speak about changing the gambling legislation that dictate how gaming is run in Florida. There were phone calls to grow the state’s casino offerings, along with plenty of help for reforming the regulations that are current remove loopholes and clarify precisely what is appropriate for operators to offer. But despite most of the important problems on the table as well as though the season is in its incipiency it seems that chances of any gambling laws passing in Florida in 2014 are getting longer every day.
Republican Retreat
That news comes after Republican legislative leaders had pledged to really make the problem a concern year that is late last. Gambling was for a list of legislative priorities that lawmakers presented to reporters before the session that is present, but who now say so it’s not likely anything will take place before some big actions happen.
House Speaker Will Weatherford said that his chamber would not act with no legislation to arrive concert having a constitutional amendment that would allow voters to weigh in on any possible gambling expansion.
‘Unless we are able to do that, I do not think you will see us taking up gaming in the home,’ the Speaker said. For Weatherford, that statement covered ‘anything new,’ presumably including regulatory changes, along by the addition of new casinos.
Lawsuits Add to Delays
The prospect of legislation may have been hampered by the nearly two dozen lawsuits currently facing the continuing state after studies and hearings had been held to examine hawaii’s video gaming legislation.
Those lawsuits cover many different issues, including laws on horse and dog race where battles over how events are conducted and whether tracks can host slots and other casino games were raging for a few time now.
‘There’s regulations. There’s dogs. There’s integrated resorts. There’s taxes. There’s slots. There is the compact. There’s decoupling. There’s injury reporting. They don’t snap together that easily,’ said Senate Gaming Committee Chairman Garrett Richter if you take all those pieces of the puzzle.
That compact could eventually show to be the issue that is largest on the table. Florida’s compact with the Seminole Tribe expires in 2015, and that deadline will ultimately make video gaming come through to the legislative agenda whether lawmakers are prepared because of it or perhaps not. The compact allows the Seminole Tribe to have exclusive rights to banked card games like blackjack throughout the state in exchange for $1 billion in payments from the tribe over the course of five years at the moment. Renewing or proposing changes to that compact will be a issue that is contentious especially if Florida thinks it makes more by eliminating the exclusivity and allowing non-Indian casino designers to create into the state.
‘Gaming can be an issue that is forced to your state either this year or next year by the Seminole compact is up for some renegotiation and once you do that you kind of touch the dominos that make the rest affected,’ said Senate President Don Gaetz. ‘ I don’t genuinely believe that expansion of gaming or gaming legislation would have been a Will Weatherford or a Don Gaetz concern.
‘It’s maybe not something we necessarily wish to be involved in,’ Gaetz said, ‘but it’s a thing that circumstances probably need either us or our successors to do some worthwhile thing about.’
