Blog

Carl Icahn accuses New Jersey State Senate President Stephen Sweeney of selling out Atlantic City by supporting a north Jersey casino.
Business mogul Carl Icahn and New Jersey State Senate President Stephen Sweeney exchanged harsh terms last Friday, with each accusing the other of selling out some portion of Atlantic City for unique gain. The war of words started after Sweeney took part in protests with union employees from the Trump Taj Mahal, protests of which Icahn proved to become a major target.
Those protests were designed to fight back against a Trump Entertainment plan to break out of a contract and cut pensions and benefits for workers in order to cut costs and keep the casino open as we reported earlier this week.
The company says that the casino will need to close on November 13 unless many concessions are granted to it, such as the cutbacks in employee benefits and $25 million in help from their state, along side a reduced taxation assessment.
Workers Blame Icahn
But Icahn turned out to be a figure that is major the protests. The protesters demonstrated near the Tropicana, which can be owned by a group led by Icahn, and numerous see him as the real threat to the benefits and wages provided https://real-money-casino.club/slots-of-vegas-online-casino/ by their present positions. In bankruptcy court, Trump Entertainment has required permission to turn its venue over to Icahn by transforming the financial obligation he holds in the company into ownership of the casino. Icahn says he’d then be willing to invest another $100 million into the Taj Mahal, but as long as his concessions are provided.
Sweeney reacted for this by saying that there had been no method the state would contribute to the transfer that is proposed Icahn, and sharply criticized the investor’s plan for the casino.
‘he wants, he’s closing anyway,’ Sweeney said if he doesn’t get everything. ‘But if he can get all this cash from the taxpayers and the workers, then he’ll invest in the property.’
Sweeney ended up being just one single of a few politicians from both major parties who criticized Icahn’s proposal at a Boardwalk press conference.
‘You get nothing from us until you treat workers with respect and dignity,’ Sweeney said.
Icahn Fires Back
But Icahn was prepared to fire straight back at Sweeney and other state officials who have criticized him while also proposing that gambling enterprises be built in north Jersey.
‘Sweeney is selling out Atlantic City to New that is northern Jersey the one hand, and now he’s telling all these workers in Atlantic City that Carl Icahn is always to blame, whenever I’m the only one that took a risk with $80 million when no body else would,’ Icahn stated. ‘ On the one hand, we are to believe Senator Sweeney is Atlantic City’s defender that is staunchest, yet having said that, similar Senator Sweeney is down in north Jersey making plans to allow gaming outside of New York City, a concession that could suggest the end of gaming in Atlantic City.’
Sweeney appears in United States District Court on this in an attempt to get a judge to force the concessions he has asked for, as the state and Atlantic City have so far rejected his terms week.
Trump Entertainment can be hoping that a Delaware bankruptcy court enables it to end the current union contract. The business is accusing the workers’ union of sacrificing 3,000 jobs at the Taj Mahal in an effort to safeguard workers at other casinos, as under the union contract, any concessions won at one casino would be allowed at other Atlantic City casinos aswell.
UK Gambling Act Challenge by GBGA Snuffed by London High Court
London’s High Court ruled against a GBGA challenge to the new British Gambling Act, letting it be implemented month that is next. (Image: thesun.co.uk)
The united kingdom Gambling Act will go into effect next thirty days after a challenge from the Gibraltar Betting and Gaming Association (GBGA) was rejected by the High Court the other day. The challenge that is legal currently been successful in delaying the implementation of the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act from October 1 to November 1, nevertheless the ruling means that the legislation will be enforced as expected.
‘we have always been for the conclusion that parliament was well within its rights to act because it did,’ stated Lord Justice Nicholas Green.
GBGA Fails to Make Its Instance
In his ruling, Green said that the GBGA failed showing that the regulations that are new be illegal under the laws of either the UK or europe. He also rejected a alternate plan proposed by the GBGA, a so-called ‘passporting’ plan, that would allow the GBGA to maintain complete certification control over its operators while agreeing to share data utilizing the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC).
The ruling means that all online gambling operators who wish to conduct business with customers in the United Kingdom will have to hold a license with the gambling commission there by November 1. This defintely won’t be a problem for most organizations that wanted to remain in the country, as most believed which they would require to apply for a license by 1 october.
The genuine changes will come into play on December 1. That’s whenever a brand new point-of-consumption tax is implemented in the UK on licensed operators. This will imply that all operators will probably pay a 15 % tax on the revenues derived from UK customers, no matter where they are headquartered or what taxes they may pay in their house nations.
GBGA Still Has Concerns
The UKGC ended up being happy using the decision, since the organization not only beat straight back the challenge, but was awarded £100,000 ($159,400) to cover for its costs that are legal.
‘We welcome this judgment and certainly will now complete preparations for utilization of the Act on 1 November,’ the UKGC published in a declaration.
Conversely, the GBGA expressed its disappointment with the court’s decision.
‘ Cross-border regulatory regimes require significant co-ordination and co-operation on key appropriate and regulatory issues and great britain already had this because of the Gibraltar industry, regulator and jurisdiction,’ the GBGA said after the ruling. ‘ We maintain this law is not within the best interests of consumers, the industry and the regulator itself and that you can find more effective ways of dealing with the challenges of regulation and competition in this sector.’
The GBGA also stated that it may be time for European officials to show up having an overarching framework for online gambling.
‘We remain concerned the united kingdom regulator will see it difficult to hold organizations to account in jurisdictions outside of the EU where it doesn’t have legal powers and typical framework that is legal culture,’ the Association statement said. ‘Given this judgment there is now even greater dependence on an EU legal framework for online gambling if our company is to effectively protect all European consumers, enjoy a common market and avoid each member state deciding alone how to deal with an activity that naturally crosses boundaries.’
The new licensing regime will even require operators to provide a appropriate rationale for their operations in gray markets where they cannot hold licenses. These requirements have led some operators to choose not to apply for a UK license, though the majority of major companies want to stay in the UK market.
From Here to Eternity: The Massachusetts Casino Journey
The Wynn Resorts casino proposition in Everett is the most current to win a permit from the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. (Image: Wynn Resorts Holdings)
Massachusetts casino certification law is back in the news in a big way this week, as the Wynn Everett project won the Greater Boston casino license after a contentious battle against a Mohegan Sun proposal. That choice, that was reached by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission in a 3-1 vote, sets the phase for Steve Wynn to construct his large resort in Everett, on the internet site of the former Monsanto plant on the outskirts of Boston.
But it’s additionally the culmination of more than three years of legislation, votes, debates and referendums, each of which combine to write the whole tale of Massachusetts’ casino gambling legislation. If you’re unfamiliar with what’s happening in the state, right here’s a fast recap of everything you require to get up to speed.
How It All Started
On November 22, 2011, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick signed the Expanded Gaming Act. This bill allowed for four brand new gambling facilities to be built in the state: three gambling enterprises and one slots parlor. Every one of the three casino licenses was linked with a specific region: one for Western Massachusetts, one for the Greater Boston area, and one for Southeastern Massachusetts. The slots parlor could be built anywhere in the state.
Developers who wished to apply for starters of the four licenses were required to go through an application that is extensive, one that included mandatory referendums by local communities where casino proposals were made.
Those referendums ended up being a critical the main licensing process, as several promising tasks didn’t earn the approval of voters. Most notably, a plan for a casino at Suffolk Downs in East Boston ended up being scuttled when votes overwhelmingly rejected the proposition, which ultimately led to that particular plan being resurrected on the Revere side of the Suffolk Downs racetrack.
Eventually, the decision of whether to award licenses and to whom they should go was determined by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, a five-member panel that oversaw the licensing process that is entire.
And the Award Goes To…
The first license was awarded to Penn National Gaming, which earned the right to build a slots parlor in Plainville in late February. That plan had been selected over a Massachusetts Live! proposal in Leominster and a Raynham Park option that did not prove popular using the commission. Finally, the payment voted 3-2 in favor of the Penn nationwide plan over the Leominster alternative.
In June, the payment then approved MGM Resorts International for the Western Massachusetts casino license. The commission voted unanimously and only awarding the license to the proposed MGM resort in Springfield, which emerged while the contender that is only the region.
This week, the video gaming payment also awarded the more Boston casino license to a Wynn Resorts project in Everett. The Wynn plan ended up being selected more than a Mohegan Sun proposal in Revere by a vote that is 3-1 with gaming commission Chairman Stephen Crosby recusing himself through the procedure.
Southeastern Massachusetts License Still to Be Determined
Therefore far, few serious contenders have emerged for the Southeastern Massachusetts casino license, which caused the video gaming commission to push back the deadline for applications from September 30, 2014 to December 1 of this year. The region’s schedule was already behind the rest of the continuing state because of the possibility that the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe might develop a casino in Taunton. When that effort felt through, the region was opened up to developers.
So far, only KG Urban has applied to create in the area, though the commission believes that other candidates whom were refused in the other two regions of the state may decide to try again in Southeastern Massachusetts.
Casino Law Repeal Nevertheless a Possibility
There is still the chance that all of these venues may never open. There’s been opposition that is significant enabling casinos in Massachusetts since the law was first signed, and that has culminated in casino opponents finding a question on a statewide ballot this November that will ask voters if they wish to repeal the casino law. Present polling suggests that such a repeal is not likely, however: one September that is early poll UMass Lowell/7News discovered that 59 % of likely voters planed to vote against the repeal effort, with just 36 percent saying they’d vote to repeal regulations.
