A UMass research on video gaming attitudes and behaviors is thought to be the largest in US history.
Gambling is an important topic in Massachusetts at the moment, as the state prepares for the coming of at least two large resort gambling enterprises in the next few years.
The University of Massachusetts at Amherst (UMass Amherst) has released a study that gives a baseline for the state of gambling in the state now, one that can then be used to track changes in long term studies in advance of that gaming expansion.
The study, which comes from the class of Public Health and Health Sciences at UMass Amherst, surveyed nearly 10,000 Massachusetts residents.
That is enough in order to make it the gambling study that is largest ever completed in the usa.
The study ended up being praised by Massachusetts Gaming Commission Chairman Steve Crosby, who said that it should provide an objective way to understand how the state is being influenced by gambling going ahead.
‘The most essential point is that we are establishing standard conditions for every socio and economic variable that could be affected by the introduction of casinos,’ Crosby said. ‘Our scientists will then track alterations in those variables over the lifetime of the casinos in order to know up to a certainty the effects also to inform data-driven mitigation strategies for almost any potential negative consequences.’
The study was conducted between September 2013 and May 2014, with state residents being selected at random to complete the questionnaire.
The result was a wealth of information detailing exactly how people in Massachusetts gamble and view different forms of gaming.
For example, it turns out that about 72 per cent of respondents reported gambling at least onetime over the year that is past.
Many Massachusetts residents (about 60 percent) said they played the lottery, while 22 percent reported that they’d gone to a casino during the year that is past.
One topic that is hot the location has been how Massachusetts’ brand new casinos will impact current casino operations in Connecticut. The study suggests that officials in Connecticut are right to be concerned: 65 percent of the Massachusetts residents who went to casinos visited resorts in Connecticut, a portion which should go way down when the Wynn Everett and MGM Springfield are operational.
The study also looked at just how residents experience the state’s gambling expansion, which includes a slots parlor and up to three casinos that are full-scale. The clear answer was one which was heard in many communities through the continuing state: not within my backyard.
A good 59 % majority of adults in Massachusetts said they think gambling expansion will either have a neutral impact or be advantageous to the state.
But, 46 percent think that gambling expansion is harmful inside their community that is own only 28 percent trust casino expansion would be beneficial locally.
The research additionally discovered that illegal gambling was fairly common in Massachusetts. About 13 percent of residents had bet on sports in the past year, while two percent reporting gambling on unregulated online gaming web sites.
More in-depth analysis associated with data collected is expected to be released within the months to come. However, major detective Rachel Volberg states that the actual value in this survey ended up being collecting information before viewpoints could be shaped by the introduction of casinos.
‘Not many people realize exactly how uncommon it is for a problem survey that is gambling be completed before some brand new type of gambling becomes available,’ Volberg said. ‘The Commonwealth is fortunate that both the Expanded Gaming Act and the Massachusetts Gaming Commission therefore clearly and forcefully supported such an effort and I also am excited to share our findings before any casinos begin operations in our state.’
FIFA President Sepp Blatter (right) after which Secretary General of Interpol, Ronald Noble, seal the deal. Interpol has now figured FIFA doesn’t share the essential values of this law enforcement community.’ No shit! (Image: cnn.com)
Interpol has frozen a €20 ($22.5 million) donation, compensated to it by FIFA, to fund a joint anti-match-fixing program.
The integrity that is 10-year Sport initiative was made to stamp down fixed games orchestrated by criminal gambling syndicates, but Interpol said this week that the FIFA corruption scandal had made the relationship untenable.
‘In light of the context that is current FIFA, while Interpol continues to be committed to developing our Integrity in Sport program, I have determined to suspend the agreement,’ said Interpol Secretary General Jürgen Stock. ‘ All partners that are external whether public or private, must share the fundamental values and principles of the company, also as those of the wider law enforcement community.’
The terms and conditions regarding the deal, signed last year, state that that FIFA must remain ‘compatible aided by the principles, aims and activities of Interpol,’ but, following the arrest of seven FIFA officials because the result of a massive FBI corruption probe, Interpol may be forgiven for feeling that the soccer body that is governing not held up its end of the bargain.
It begs the question, though, why was Interpol, using its wide-reaching access to an expansive network of police force agencies, uninformed of FIFA corruption in 2011?
The British press was crying foul as far straight back as 2006. This was the that journalist Andrew Jennings published Foul year! The Secret World of FIFA: Bribes, Vote-Rigging and Ticket Scandals. The title says it all.
Also in 2006, Panorama, a BBC present affairs system, broadcast a documentary asserting planet oz 7 bonus codes that Sepp Blatter had been investigated by Swiss police for attempting to wallpaper over a FIFA bribery scandal.
The former chairman of the English Football Association, described FIFA as an organization that ‘behaves like a mafia family’ in it, Lord Triesman,
A Panorama that is follow-up documentary 2010 accused Issa Hayatou, Vice President of FIFA, of taking bribes. He threatened to sue the BBC, but he did not.
Interpol’s willingness to bury its head in the sand was more concerning the fact that the €20 million FIFA paid to the international police agency constituted more than 25 % of its annual budget.
Finally, though, with FIFA exposed and indicted by the usa, the nation that is only dared to hold the organization to task, it ended up being too much, or to embarrassing, for Interpol to stomach.
On a lighter note, the FIFA communications director Walter De Gregorio cracked a ‘joke’ about his employers on Swiss TV this week, and believe us, it’s a zinger!
‘ The FIFA president, secretary general and communications director are all traveling in a motor car,’ grinned De Gregorio.
‘But who’s driving?’ he quizzed.
‘The authorities,’ he zinged.
Fleetingly afterwards FIFA announced that De Gregorio had plumped for to ‘relinquish his office.’
Safa Abdulla Al Geabury, whose £2 million dud check bounced when Ritz staff tried to cash it the time after his gambling spree. (Image: standard.co.uk)
The Ritz Club, London’s famously high-end, high-roller casino, is suing A swiss home tycoon more than a £2 million ($3.1 million) bounced check.
In accordance with the Ritz’s filing, Safa Abdulla Al Geabury wrote out the check to finance a gambling session one night in February last year, but it turned out to be a dud once the casino tried to bank it the morning that is following.
The Ritz normally searching for a supplementary £200,000 ($310,000) in accumulated interest on the debt.
It has been reported that the casino, which can be owned by reclusive billionaire twins that are identical Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay, has been plunged into the red with a variety of unpaid gambling debts, forcing it to pursue its debtors aggressively within the courts.
According to the London Evening Standard, the casino has litigated against 10 high rollers in the last 12 months alone in an effort to recoup 2013 losses of £12.5 million ($19.4 million).
Al Geabury’s defense is which he is a gambling addict and his staff should have understood this and stopped him from playing.
He desires the debts written off, but he is on shaky ground with this line; in 2014 the casino won a similar High Court battle against Noora Al-Daher, the wife regarding the Omani foreign minister.
The Ritz sued Al-Daher after she had visited the casino in April 2012 and proceeded to lose £2 million ($3.3 million) in a couple of hours. Al-Daher failed to honor £1 million ($1.65) of her debt. She promptly counter-sued the casino, claiming that the casino had taken benefit of her.
Al-Daher had claimed in court that Ritz Club employees encouraged her to continue playing a game of chemin-de-fer, despite having been made aware of her gambling addiction, and even allowed her to cash checks, which she claimed was unlawful.
She also said that the casino have been under a ‘duty of care’ towards her, a responsibility which it had failed to fulfill.
Nevertheless, the court heard that Al-Daher and her family had apparently happily gambled away $5 million in Las Vegas a few months after her see to your Ritz.
The judge said he had been particular that, had Al-Daher been refused authorization to carry on gambling at the Ritz, she ‘would have been eager and inclined to gamble at other casinos thereafter, and very probably during her stay in London during the days or months after 3 April 2012. in governing in favor of this casino’
The judge within the Al Geabury instance, Mrs Justice Simler, meanwhile, said at a initial hearing that psychiatric reports happen commissioned to evaluate Al Geabury’s state of brain on the time he lost the money and whether he had been in charge of their actions.
‘The essence is whether Mr Al Geabury features a gambling addiction plus the claimant’s familiarity with that,’ she said.